Robust Flood Defence in response to Climate Change

Westkapelle Case

Student Report (2018)
Author(s)

M.H.K. Niazi (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

N. Sigalas (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

F.C.B. Scott (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

F. Grossmann (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

K.A.A.H. Damdam (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Contributor(s)

Myron van Damme – Mentor

Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Copyright
© 2018 Muhammad Hassan Khan Niazi, Nikos Sigalas, Fred Scott, Florian Grossmann, Khaled Damdam
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 Muhammad Hassan Khan Niazi, Nikos Sigalas, Fred Scott, Florian Grossmann, Khaled Damdam
Coordinates
51.5293, 3.4406
Graduation Date
08-06-2018
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
Civil Engineering | Hydraulic Engineering | Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In the Netherlands flood protection is immensely important for the safety of the nation. The shocking outcome of the 1953 flooding proves this point. In modern days, the development of socioeconomic and climate change factors casts doubt on the effectiveness of conventional approaches to flood risk management. Consequently, this project explored new approaches to flood risk management.
An analysis of climate change effects led to estimation of future loading conditions. Subsequently, a detailed hydrodynamic analysis was conducted. It highlighted the significant levels of uncertainty that climate change introduces into loading conditions. Also, it confirmed the team’s perception, that the Westkapelle case region requires additional safety measures to guarantee an acceptable level of safety in the future. But how to guarantee the acceptable level of safety in the most efficient way? The team adopted the concept of robustness to find an answer. In a keynote publication Mens (2015) describes robustness in the following way: "Robust flood risk systems have some degree of resistance and some degree of resilience: the system can withstand some floods (no response), and for other (larger) floods impacts are limited and the system can recover quickly from the flood impact (response and recovery)." The team set out to include robustness as an integral part of the design process to handle uncertainties. The project shall be seen as an explorative study how this can be done, revolving around Westkapelle as a case study that proves the methodology’s feasibility. Robustness and uncertainty were included on multiple levels throughout the design process. Firstly, the range of uncertainties was quantified. Secondly, the effect, that single parameters have on the magnitude of uncertainties, was assessed. Thirdly, the system’s capacity was analysed to find the required overtopping reduction for guaranteeing sufficient safety. Fourthly, constructive measures were assessed on their robustness potential and satisfaction of stakeholder needs via a Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA). The MCA was then employed to select the type of constructive and non constructive measures to achieve the required levels of overtopping and safety. With the information on uncertainties, the measures were combined to form a robust design, consisting of living breakwater, dike heightening, surface protection and two policy measures. Probabilistic analysis was also done to see the sensitivity of the failure probability to sea level rise in different loading and design scenarios. A thorough comparison between the conventional design, that has been applied to the project location, and the robust design followed. The robust design came out on top. Robustness was found to be an effective tool in countering uncertainties. Where conventional design methodologies are lacking flexibility and precision, the robust design methodology makes use of the system and its resilience to find an optimal solution. Its applicability may not be limited to flood risk management only but stretch out to other civil engineering disciplines.

Files

License info not available