When are negative emissions negative emissions?

Review (2019)
Authors

S.E. Tanzer (TU Delft - Energy and Industry)

Andrea Ramirez Ramírez (TU Delft - Energy and Industry)

Research Group
Energy and Industry
Copyright
© 2019 Samantha Eleanor Tanzer, Andrea Ramirez
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ee03338b
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 Samantha Eleanor Tanzer, Andrea Ramirez
Related content
Research Group
Energy and Industry
Issue number
4
Volume number
12
Pages (from-to)
1210-1218
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ee03338b
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Negative emission technologies (NETs) have seen a recent surge of interest in both academic and popular media and have been hailed as both a saviour and false idol of global warming mitigation. Proponents hope NETs can prevent or reverse catastrophic climate change by permanently removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. But there is currently limited agreement on what "negative emissions" are. This paper highlights inconsistencies in negative emission accounting in recent NET literature, focusing on the influence of system boundary selection. A quantified step-by-step example provides a clear picture of the impact of system boundary choices on the estimated emissions of a NET system. Finally, this paper proposes a checklist of minimum qualifications that a NET system and its emission accounting should be able to satisfy to determine if it could result in negative emissions.

Files

TanzerRamirez2019_AcceptedManu... (pdf)
(pdf | 1.28 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-04-2020
License info not available