How big is big enough? Cost-optimal design for centralized and decentralized e-SAF production
Thijmen Wiltink (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)
Andrea Ramírez (TU Delft - Applied Sciences)
Mar Pérez-Fortes (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Converting biogenic CO2 into synthetic sustainable aviation fuel (e-SAF) requires significant amounts of renewable energy, and alignment between system elements and sizes. However, the optimal scale and configuration of CO2 electrolysis remains unresolved. This study examines the economics of RFNBO-compliant e-SAF production from CO2 electrolysis via Fischer–Tropsch synthesis in centralized and decentralized configurations in the Netherlands. A two-stage optimization framework sized the renewable generation, storage, and use of grid electricity for electrolysis plants (9–900 MW). The model projects scenarios from 2025 to 2050, including expected cost and efficiency improvements. The lowest near-term (2025) levelized cost of e-SAF (around 5230 EUR2019/tonne) is achieved for a centralized 90 MW electrolysis plant powered by onshore wind and photovoltaics. A 23 MW decentralized system yields comparable costs. While conversion investment costs are higher at smaller scales, they are counterbalanced by avoided grid fees, higher allowed grid mix electricity consumption, and lower CO2 supply cost. By 2050, decentral e-SAF production costs are projected at 2750 EUR2019/tonne (a 35–70% premium over current SAF prices). These systems provide a near-term route for demonstration projects by co-locating renewable energy, e-SAF production, and regional airports. However, two fundamental caveats remain. First, the cost of CO2 electrolysis–based fuels is incompatible with bulk fuel margins. Second, the limited production volumes from a decentralized configuration are misaligned with the high demand of the aviation sector. Therefore, CO2 electrolysis appears best deployed in a high-value niche product or where high-quality renewable resources geographically overlap with distributed biogenic CO2 streams.