The importance of stakeholders in scoping risk assessments—Lessons from low-carbon transitions

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Oscar van Vliet (ETH Zürich)

Susanne Hanger-Kopp (ETH Zürich, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis)

Alexandros Nikas (National Technical University of Athens)

Eise Spijker (Joint Implementation Network (JIN))

Henrik Carlsen (Stockholm Environment Institute US)

Haris Doukas (National Technical University of Athens)

Jenny Lieu (ETH Zürich, TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Research Group
Learning & Autonomous Control
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.04.001 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Research Group
Learning & Autonomous Control
Journal title
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Volume number
35
Pages (from-to)
400-413
Downloads counter
317
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Identifying the risks that could impact a low-carbon transition is a prerequisite to assessing and managing these risks. We systematically characterise risks associated with decarbonisation pathways in fifteen case studies conducted in twelve countries around the world. We find that stakeholders from business, government, NGOs, and others supplied some 40 % of these risk inputs, significantly widening the scope of risks considered by academics and experts. Overall, experts and academics consider more economic risks and assess these with quantitative methods and models, while other stakeholders consider political risks more. To avoid losing sight of risks that cannot be easily quantified and modelled, including some economic risks, impact assessment modelling should be complemented with qualitative research and active stakeholder engagement. A systematic risk elicitation facilitates communication with stakeholders, enables better risk mitigation, and increases the chance of a sustainable transition.