Questions for Hierarchical Confucianism

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

E. Ziliotti (TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Copyright
© 2022 E. Ziliotti
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670522000304
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 E. Ziliotti
Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Issue number
3
Volume number
84
Pages (from-to)
329-349
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Through a new argumentative strategy, this article shows that the claims offered by some contemporary Confucian scholars in support of hierarchical social relations do not hold in contemporary societies. Exegetical disagreements that are arguably difficult to overcome are sidestepped and empirical claims in support of hierarchical Confucianism are assessed. Empirical evidence and recent developments in Western philosophy suggest that social hierarchies are detrimental to key factors for people's material well-being, ethical development, and the political order. Egalitarian social relations organized in a representative democratic system appear to be more suitable for the pursuit of the fundamental aims of a Confucian government which are accepted by the proponents of hierarchical Confucianism.