The impact of simulated intra-abdominal movement on basic laparoscopic skills development

a feasibility study

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Jan Willem Klok (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Masie Rahimi (Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Skills Centre for Health Sciences, Amsterdam UMC)

Sem Hardon (Amsterdam UMC)

Roelf Postema (Spijkenisse Medisch Centrum, TU Delft - Biomechanical Engineering)

Jaap Bonjer (Amsterdam Skills Centre for Health Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam)

Freek Daams (Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC)

Jenny Dankelman (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Tim Horeman (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2025.2481394
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Journal title
Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies
Issue number
4
Volume number
34
Pages (from-to)
324-333
Downloads counter
266
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic surgery requires a complex set of motor skills. Currently, basic laparoscopic skills training is performed in a static environment, while intraoperatively, abdominal tissue is often moving. The aim of this study was to develop a dynamic training platform and evaluate its impact on laparoscopic skills acquisition in a box trainer. Methods: The Dynamic Laparoscopic Platform (DyLaP) includes a moving base which has been intergrated with the Lapron box trainer and the ForceSense objective measurement system. Dynamic training was evaluated in a comparative study where novices were divided into a static and dynamic training group, performing six training trials of a peg transfer task with the DyLaP. Afterwards, both groups performed a dynamic exam task. Task manipulation (force) and instrument efficiency (path length and time) were measured. Results: Participants (n = 12) exhibited a significant difference (p < 0.05) in time, path length, and maximum force between the static and dynamic groups in the first trial. Learning curves were most prevalent in the dynamic group. Conclusions: The DyLaP can be used to provide a challenging and realistic training environment. From the comparative peg transfer study, it can be concluded that dynamic training significantly affects laparoscopic skill acquisition. More research is needed to evaluate dynamic training effects in force-based training tasks.