Integration of fluid-invasive, scattering, and imaging methods in resolving pore structures in coal and shale

Journal Article (2025)
Authors

Shubham Kumar (Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Monash University)

Debanjan Chandra (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), TU Delft - Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics)

Bodhisatwa Hazra (Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research)

Vikram Vishal (Indian Institute of Technology Bombay)

Pathegama Gamage Ranjith (Monash University)

Anwesa Das (Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Limited (CMPDIL))

Mayank Ahuja (Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Limited (CMPDIL))

Sayan Ghosh (Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Limited (CMPDIL))

Research Group
Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.135185
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Volume number
395
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.135185
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In this study, coal and shale samples were collected from the gas-rich Barakar Formations and investigated using various analytical and imaging methods, to quantify their pore attributes. The results indicate that coal contains an abundance of nanopores that occur in clusters, along with evidence of microfractures in its structure, as observed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The accessible micropore surface area (SA) of coal samples is around 2.5 times higher than that of shale samples, while the total mesopore SA in coal is around half that of shales. However, the average pore width of coal samples is approximately 0.82 times that of shale samples. These findings suggest that a higher percentage of organic carbon in coal contributes to an abundance of organic pores, which results in greater porosity in coal samples when compared to shale. The total SA determined by gas adsorption for the entire spectrum of pore sizes in coal is around two times that of shale. Interestingly, despite the difference in the pore SA and the pore volume, the pore surface roughness in the studied coals is almost equal to or slightly higher than that of shales. The study observations show that the total organic carbon and mineral composition in coal and shale play little influence on the degree of pore connectivity. The degree of pore connectivity for the coal samples varies from 0.4–0.93, whereas for shale samples it ranges from 0.50–0.82. This study provides analytical insights into the pore structure of coal and shale collected from the same reservoir by considering factors such as depth, mineralogical content, and surface roughness. During CO2 injection, coal and shale reservoirs may experience swelling induced stress changes, potentially impacting their mechanical stability. Thus, this study provides insight into estimating the gas-storage capacities of both coal and shale reservoirs and aims to optimise the gas adsorption and maintain structural integrity. This approach ensures the long-term feasibility of implementing Enhanced Coalbed Methane (ECBM) recovery and shale gas recovery in other gas basins.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 02-10-2025