Planning of public housing in modern Tianjin (1928–1945)

Journal Article (2017)
Author(s)

Y. Sun (TU Delft - OLD History of Architecture & Urban Planning, Tianjin University)

C.M. Hein (TU Delft - OLD History of Architecture & Urban Planning)

Kun Song (Tianjin University)

Research Group
OLD History of Architecture & Urban Planning
Copyright
© 2017 Y. Sun, C.M. Hein, Kun Song
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2017.1408487
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Copyright
© 2017 Y. Sun, C.M. Hein, Kun Song
Research Group
OLD History of Architecture & Urban Planning
Issue number
3
Volume number
34 (2019)
Pages (from-to)
439-462
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

European, American, and Japanese debates on public housing served as models for those in modern China, and Chinese scholars and professionals, with the support of the KMT (Kuomintang), developed public housing as a sign of innovation in both societal reform and building typology. Using the under-researched case of Tianjin's public housing during the so-called Nanjing Decade (1928–1937) and then again during the Japanese Occupation (1937–1945) as case studies, the paper first explores how journals, books, and foreign-trained Chinese scholars introduced the concept of public housing to China. It then examines five public housing projects that municipal authorities developed for Tianjin, two in the Nanjing Decade and three during the Japanese Occupation. Analysing the sites, architectural designs, and management rules of these projects, the paper argues that the projects in the Nanjing Decade (both planned and realized) mostly targeted poor families, serving to simultaneously solve housing problems, reform society, and police the poor; while the projects during the Japanese Occupation benefited high-income people or the Japanese, and did not play a role in the relief of the local poor, who suffered most from the housing shortage.