The potential of scintillator-based photon counting detectors

Evaluation using Monte Carlo simulations

Conference Paper (2025)
Authors

Scott S. Hsieh (Mayo Clinic)

Katsuyuki Taguchi (Johns Hopkins University)

Marlies Goorden (TU Delft - RST/Medical Physics & Technology)

D.R. Schaart (TU Delft - RST/Medical Physics & Technology)

Research Group
RST/Medical Physics & Technology
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3045837
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
RST/Medical Physics & Technology
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
ISBN (electronic)
9781510685888
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3045837
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Direct conversion photon counting detectors (PCDs) using CdTe, CZT, or Si for the sensor material are being investigated and manufactured. Indirect conversion, scintillator-based PCDs have historically thought to be too slow for the high flux requirements of diagnostic CT. Recent scintillators investigated for e.g. PET applications are very fast and inspire us to rethink this paradigm. We evaluate the potential of a LaBr3:Ce PCD using Monte Carlo simulations. We compared a CdTe PCD and a LaBr3:Ce PCD, assuming a pixel density of 9 pixels/mm2 in each case and a surrounding 2D anti-scatter grid. A 1x1 mm2 area was illuminated by flat field X-rays and the lower bound on the noise for varying contrast types and material decomposition scenarios was calculated. For conventional imaging without material decomposition, the LaBr3:Ce PCD performed worse than CdTe because of the need to wrap pixels in reflector, which reduces geometric efficiency. For water-bone material decomposition, the two PCDs performed similarly with our assumptions on pulse shape and PCD geometry. For three-material decomposition with a K-edge imaging agent, LaBr3:Ce reduced variance by about 35% because of the elimination of charge sharing that is present in CdTe. These results motivate further exploration of scintillator-based PCDs as an alternative to direct conversion PCDs, especially with future K-edge imaging agents.

Files

1340537.pdf
(pdf | 1.07 Mb)
License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 08-10-2025