Assessment of Coronary Microcirculation with High Frame-Rate Contrast-Enhanced Echocardiography
Geraldi Wahyulaksana (Erasmus MC, Weill Cornell Medical College)
Luxi Wei (Erasmus MC)
Jason Voorneveld (Erasmus MC)
Maaike te Lintel Hekkert (Erasmus MC)
Daniel J. Bowen (Erasmus MC)
Mihai Strachinaru (Erasmus MC)
Dirk J. Duncker (Erasmus MC)
Antonius F.W. van der Steen (TU Delft - ImPhys/Verweij group, Erasmus MC, TU Delft - ImPhys/Medical Imaging)
Hendrik J. Vos (TU Delft - ImPhys/Verweij group, Erasmus MC)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Objective: Assessing myocardial perfusion in acute myocardial infarction is important for guiding clinicians in choosing appropriate treatment strategies. Echocardiography can be used due to its direct feedback and bedside nature, but it currently faces image quality issues and an inability to differentiate coronary macro- from micro-circulation. We previously developed an imaging scheme using high frame-rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (HFR CEUS) with higher order singular value decomposition (HOSVD) that provides dynamic perfusion and vascular flow visualization. In this study, we aim to show the ability of this technique to image perfusion deficits and investigate the potential occurrence of false-positive contrast detection. Methods: We used a porcine model comprising occlusion and release of the left anterior descending coronary artery. During slow contrast agent infusion, the afore-mentioned imaging scheme was used to capture and process the data offline using HOSVD. Results: Fast and slow coronary flow was successfully differentiated, presumably representing the different compartments of the micro-circulation. Low perfusion was seen in the area that was affected, as expected by vascular occlusion. Furthermore, we also imaged coronary flow dynamics before, during and after release of the occlusion, the latter showing hyperemia as expected. A contrast agent destruction test showed that the processed images contained actual contrast signal in the cardiac phases with minimal motion. With larger tissue motion, tissue signal leaked into the contrast-enhanced images. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the feasibility of HFR CEUS with HOSVD as a viable option for assessing myocardial perfusion. Flow dynamics were resolved, which potentially helped to directly evaluate coronary flow deficits.