Library
local_library Home Repository

Obtaining wheelchair kinematics with one sensor only? The trade-off between number of inertial sensors and accuracy for measuring wheelchair mobility performance in sports

Journal Article (2022)
Authors

M.P. van Dijk (TU Delft - Biomechanical Engineering)

R.M.A. van der Slikke (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control, The Hague University of Applied Sciences)

Rob Rupf (University of Toronto)

Marco J.M. Hoozemans (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Monique A.M. Berger (The Hague University of Applied Sciences)

H. E.J.(Dirkjan) Veeger (TU Delft - Biomechanical Engineering)

Department
Biomechanical Engineering
Copyright
© 2022 M.P. van Dijk, R.M.A. van der Slikke, Rob Rupf, Marco J.M. Hoozemans, Monique A.M. Berger, H.E.J. Veeger
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110879
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 M.P. van Dijk, R.M.A. van der Slikke, Rob Rupf, Marco J.M. Hoozemans, Monique A.M. Berger, H.E.J. Veeger
Department
Biomechanical Engineering
Volume number
130
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110879
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In wheelchair sports, the use of Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) has proven to be one of the most accessible ways for ambulatory measurement of wheelchair kinematics. A three-IMU configuration, with one IMU attached to the wheelchair frame and two IMUs on each wheel axle, has previously shown accurate results and is considered optimal for accuracy. Configurations with fewer sensors reduce costs and could enhance usability, but may be less accurate. The aim of this study was to quantify the decline in accuracy for measuring wheelchair kinematics with a stepwise sensor reduction. Ten differently skilled participants performed a series of wheelchair sport specific tests while their performance was simultaneously measured with IMUs and an optical motion capture system which served as reference. Subsequently, both a one-IMU and a two-IMU configuration were validated and the accuracy of the two approaches was compared for linear and angular wheelchair velocity. Results revealed that the one-IMU approach show a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.10 m/s for absolute linear velocity and a MAE of 8.1°/s for wheelchair angular velocity when compared with the reference system. The two-IMU approach showed similar differences for absolute linear wheelchair velocity (MAE 0.10 m/s), and smaller differences for angular velocity (MAE 3.0°/s). Overall, a lower number of IMUs used in the configuration resulted in a lower accuracy of wheelchair kinematics. Based on the results of this study, choices regarding the number of IMUs can be made depending on the aim, required accuracy and resources available.