Unperceived motor actions of the balance system interfere with the causal attribution of self-motion

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Romain Tisserand (Université de Poitiers, University of British Columbia, Université Tours)

Brandon G. Rasman (University of Otago, Erasmus MC)

Nina Omerovic (Erasmus MC)

Ryan M. Peters (University of British Columbia, University of Calgary)

P.A. Forbes (Erasmus MC, TU Delft - Biomechanical Engineering)

Jean Sébastien Blouin (University of British Columbia)

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac174 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Issue number
4
Volume number
1
Article number
pgac174
Pages (from-to)
1-13
Downloads counter
233
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The instability of human bipedalism demands that the brain accurately senses balancing self-motion and determines whether movements originate from self-generated actions or external disturbances. Here, we challenge the longstanding notion that this process relies on a single representation of the body and world to accurately perceive postural orientation and organize motor responses to control balance self-motion. Instead, we find that the conscious sense of balance can be distorted by the corrective control of upright standing. Using psychophysics, we quantified thresholds to imposed perturbations and balance responses evoking cues of self-motion that are (in)distinguishable from corrective balance actions. When standing immobile, participants clearly perceived imposed perturbations. Conversely, when freely balancing, participants often misattributed their own corrective responses as imposed motion because their balance system had detected, integrated, and responded to the perturbation in the absence of conscious perception. Importantly, this only occurred for perturbations encoded ambiguously with balance-correcting responses and that remained below the natural variability of ongoing balancing oscillations. These findings reveal that our balance system operates on its own sensorimotor principles that can interfere with causal attribution of our actions, and that our conscious sense of balance depends critically on the source and statistics of induced and self-generated motion cues.