Effective notch stress, random fatigue limit, and non-linear damage accumulation-based CA-VA fatigue resistance similarity of welded joints in steel structures
Ruben Leonard Geert Slange (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)
Marije Deul (TNO)
Agnes Marie Horn (Det Norske Veritas (DNV))
Henk Den Besten (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Fatigue is often a governing limit state for steel (maritime) structures operating in variable amplitude loading conditions. Arc-welded joints connecting the structural members are typically the weakest links, and accurate lifetime estimates are essential for structural design. However, a resistance formulation and damage accumulation model incorporating the mid- and high-cycle fatigue strength and mechanism contributions is not available. In particular, one containing explicitly defined damage reliability and confidence levels. A generalized random fatigue limit resistance formulation and a generalized non-linear damage accumulation model, including the variable amplitude loading induced fatigue limit degradation, are proposed to improve the lifetime estimates applicable for fatigue assessment in the frequency domain. The most likely fatigue resistance parameters are obtained by analysing fatigue resistance data from literature containing a broad range of loading distributions. Adopting the average effective notch stress as a fatigue strength parameter, including global mean stress effects, constant and variable amplitude fatigue resistance similarity is obtained, as reflected in a mean damage estimate of one. The fatigue lifetime estimate accuracy significantly improved in comparison to state-of-the-art guidelines and codes (e.g. IIW, DNV, BS). Consistent reliability and confidence levels for constant and variable amplitude fatigue assessment for design suggest an allowable damage of 0.2. A similar value for guidelines and codes illustrates over-conservatism from a fatigue resistance perspective.