Expected versus experienced neck comfort

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

Joyce Bouwens (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering, ZODIAC Seats US Division)

U. Schultheis (ZODIAC Seats US Division)

Suzanne Hiemstra-van Mastrigt (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Peter Vink (ZODIAC Seats US Division)

Research Group
Human Factors
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20721 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Research Group
Human Factors
Issue number
1
Volume number
28
Pages (from-to)
29-37
Downloads counter
215

Abstract

There is certainly room for economy-class travelers to make their trips more pleasant. A travel pillow might improve comfort. In this study, the comfort expectations and experience of travel pillows were examined. Comparing these 2 aspects indicated that it is not always possible to predict the comfort experience associated with a product based on a picture, and that there is a discrepancy between expected and experienced comfort. Experienced comfort is highest for travel pillows that restrict head movements in all directions in order to maintain a neutral posture. The results of this study also support earlier studies that suggested that discomfort experience can be predicted by observing the number of participants’ in-seat movements; more movements result in higher experienced discomfort