Renewable synthesis fuels for a circular economy

A life cycle assessment

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Du Wen (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)

Po-Chih Kuo (University of Tokyo)

Samrand Saeidi (Silesian University of Technology)

F. Özdemir (TU Delft - Energy Technology)

François Maréchal (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)

Research Group
Energy Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107851
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Energy Technology
Volume number
211
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Renewable synthesis fuels play a crucial role in enabling a circular economy. This study assesses the environmental impacts of power-to-hydrogen and biomass-to-hydrogen routes, considering four hydrogen storage options: hydrogen, ammonia, methane, and methanol with a function unit of 1 liter of a stored hydrogen-derived product. The assessment encompasses metrics such as carbon footprint, use of fossil and nuclear energy, ecosystem quality, human health impact, and water scarcity. The results reveal that the biomass-based route has a lesser impact on global warming potential (GWP), with the system involving chemical looping technology and using ammonia as the storage medium achieving a negative GWP of -7.55 kg CO2eq. The power-based route outperforms the biomass-based route except for GWP which is influenced by the penetration of renewable energy. Liquid hydrogen is found to be suitable for the fossil fuel-based route, while methane and ammonia are favorable to the power-based and biomass-based routes, respectively.

Files

1-s2.0-S0921344924004440-main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 4.6 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 21-02-2025
License info not available