Increasing accuracy of pulse transit time measurements by automated elimination of distorted photoplethysmography waves

Journal Article (2017)
Author(s)

M.H.N. van Velzen ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

A.J. J. Loeve (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Sjoerd P. Niehof ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

E.G. Mik ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Copyright
© 2017 M.H.N. van Velzen, A.J. Loeve, S.P. Niehof, E.G. Mik
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1642-x
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Copyright
© 2017 M.H.N. van Velzen, A.J. Loeve, S.P. Niehof, E.G. Mik
Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Issue number
11
Volume number
55
Pages (from-to)
1989-2000
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a widely available non-invasive optical technique to visualize pressure pulse waves (PWs). Pulse transit time (PTT) is a physiological parameter that is often derived from calculations on ECG and PPG signals and is based on tightly defined characteristics of the PW shape. PPG signals are sensitive to artefacts. Coughing or movement of the subject can affect PW shapes that much that the PWs become unsuitable for further analysis. The aim of this study was to develop an algorithm that automatically and objectively eliminates unsuitable PWs. In order to develop a proper algorithm for eliminating unsuitable PWs, a literature study was conducted. Next, a ‘7Step PW-Filter’ algorithm was developed that applies seven criteria to determine whether a PW matches the characteristics required to allow PTT calculation. To validate whether the ‘7Step PW-Filter’ eliminates only and all unsuitable PWs, its elimination results were compared to the outcome of manual elimination of unsuitable PWs. The ‘7Step PW-Filter’ had a sensitivity of 96.3% and a specificity of 99.3%. The overall accuracy of the ‘7Step PW-Filter’ for detection of unsuitable PWs was 99.3%. Compared to manual elimination, using the ‘7Step PW-Filter’ reduces PW elimination times from hours to minutes and helps to increase the validity, reliability and reproducibility of PTT data.