Exploring path dependence, policy interactions, and actor behavior in the German biodiesel supply chain

Journal Article (2017)
Authors

J. A. Moncada (Universiteit Utrecht)

M. Junginger (Universiteit Utrecht)

Zofia Lukszo (TU Delft - Energy and Industry)

Andre Faaij (University Medical Center Groningen)

M.P.C. Weijnen (TU Delft - Energy and Industry)

Research Group
Energy and Industry
Copyright
© 2017 J. A. Moncada, M Junginger, Z. Lukszo, A Faaij, M.P.C. Weijnen
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.047
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Copyright
© 2017 J. A. Moncada, M Junginger, Z. Lukszo, A Faaij, M.P.C. Weijnen
Research Group
Energy and Industry
Volume number
195
Pages (from-to)
370-381
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.047
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Biofuel production is not cost competitive and thus requires governmental intervention. The effect of the institutional framework on the development of the biofuel sector is not yet well understood. This paper aims to analyze how biofuel production and production capacity could have evolved in Germany in the period 1992–2014. The effects of an agricultural policy intervention (liberalization of the agricultural market) and a bioenergy policy intervention (a tax on biodiesel after an initial exemption) are explored. Elements of the Modeling Agent systems based on Institutional Analysis (MAIA) framework, complex adaptive systems (CAS) theory, and Neo Institutional Economics (NIE) theory were used to conceptualize and formalize the system in an agent-based model. It was found that an early liberalization of the agricultural market led to an under-production of biodiesel; a late liberalization led to the collapse of biodiesel production. An early introduction of the biodiesel tax led to stagnation in biodiesel production and production capacity; a late introduction led to an increase in sunk costs provided that the biofuel quota is binding. Also, a lack of agents’ adaptation mechanism to forecast prices led to a decrease in patterns of biodiesel production when an external shock was introduced in the system. In sum, we argue that system behavior is influenced by individual behavior which is shaped by institutions.