Combined Strength of Standardized Lab Sprint Testing and Wheelchair Mobility Field Testing in Wheelchair Tennis Players

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Rowie J.F. Janssen (University Medical Center Groningen)

Marit P. Van Dijk (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Thomas Rietveld (Loughborough University)

Sonja De Groot (Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center Reade, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Lucas H.V. Van Der Woude (University Medical Center Groningen)

Han Houdijk (University Medical Center Groningen)

Riemer J.K. Vegter (University Medical Center Groningen, Loughborough University)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002717
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Journal title
American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Issue number
4
Volume number
104
Pages (from-to)
376-382
Downloads counter
157
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Objective This cross-sectional study examined associations between wheelchair sprint and anaerobic power (measured in the lab) and wheelchair mobility performance (measured in the field) among two groups of wheelchair tennis players. Additionally, construct validity was assessed for both lab and field tests. Design Nine amateur and nine elite wheelchair tennis players performed a Sprint and Wingate test on a wheelchair ergometer in the lab and a Sprint, Illinois, and Spider test in the field, with inertial measurement units on their wheelchairs. Associations were assessed using regression analyses, and construct validity was assessed with an independent t test (elite vs. amateur). Results The strongest associations were observed between lab outcomes and field sprint power (R2 > 90%), followed by peak linear velocity and test duration (R2 = 77%-85%), while peak rotational velocity showed the lowest associations with lab outcomes (R2 = 69%-80%). The elite group outperformed the amateur group on all test outcomes. Conclusions Despite differences in lab- and field-testing methodologies (e.g., trunk influence, linear/rotational components), the strong associations indicate overlap in measured constructs. Field testing offers valuable insight into practical performance, whereas lab testing enables in-depth biomechanical and physiological analyses. All tests effectively discriminate between elite and amateur wheelchair tennis players.