Interactions and distortions of different support policies for green hydrogen

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Alexander Hoogsteyn (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, EnergyVille)

Jelle Meus (EnergyVille, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)

Kenneth Bruninx (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, TU Delft - Energy and Industry)

Erik Delarue (EnergyVille, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)

Research Group
Energy and Industry
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108042
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Energy and Industry
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.
Volume number
141
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper explores various policies to support climate-neutral hydrogen production, focusing on their interaction with energy markets and cap-and-trade systems such as the EU emission trading scheme. We develop and deploy a state-of-the-art equilibrium model to examine the effect of hydrogen support policies on the interactions between hydrogen, electricity and emission markets. Our analysis shows that mechanisms remunerating hydrogen production can distort spot prices of electricity and hydrogen more strongly than mechanisms that remunerate hydrogen production capacity. Hydrogen support mechanisms furthermore promote renewable electricity production and deter investment in conventional generation assets. The associated decrease in emissions in the power sector leads to an increase of emissions in the industrial and hydrogen sector due to the waterbed effect in the EU emission trading scheme. Our case study on an emission-capped area inspired by the EU shows that the operational distortions that production-based mechanisms exhibit, typically increase costs more than the investment distortions that capacity-based mechanisms entail.

Files

1-s2.0-S0140988324007515-main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 1.6 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 16-05-2025
License info not available