An ethics assessment list for geoinformation ecosystems

revisiting the integrated geospatial information framework of the United Nations

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

S. Calzati (TU Delft - Urban Data Science)

Bastiaan van Loenen (TU Delft - Urban Data Science)

Research Group
Urban Data Science
Copyright
© 2023 S. Calzati, B. van Loenen
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2023.2200041
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 S. Calzati, B. van Loenen
Research Group
Urban Data Science
Issue number
1
Volume number
16
Pages (from-to)
1418-1438
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

To achieve sustainable development goals, georeferenced data and geographic information systems play a crucial role. Yet, the way in which these data and systems are summoned upon rests on positivist assumptions which overlook both epistemological and ethical concerns. This is epitomized by the integrated geospatial information framework (IGIF) of the United Nations, which, from the perspective of sustainable development, aims to provide guidance for the management of geoinformation and related tools, considering these as mirrors of the physical world. In this respect, the article has three main goals. First, it delivers an epistemological and ethical critique of the IGIF, by highlighting its internal tensions. Second, it suggests how the IGIF and similar geoinformation initiatives can benefit from an ethical reflection that allows to conduct georeferenced practices in a fair(er) way. Third, it designs an ethics assessment list for self-evaluating the ethical robustness of geoinformation initiatives as ecosystems.