From Feedstock to Future Chemicals
Rethinking Carbon Sources in Industrial Propylene Clusters
I. Stepchuk (TU Delft - Energy and Industry)
Mar Pérez-Fortes (TU Delft - Energy and Industry)
Andrea Ramirez (TU Delft - ChemE/Chemical Engineering)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
The rising pressure to defossilize the chemical industry has driven research toward producing chemicals that use alternative carbon sources (ACS). However, the challenges and impacts of replacing already implemented processes and symbiotic relationships remain largely underexplored. This paper systematically assesses the impacts of defossilizing existing processes, both individually and simultaneously, in a propylene cluster in the Port of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Nine fossil-based processes and three ACS-based processes (i.e., CO2-based polyol, biopropylene glycol (bio-PG), and biomethyl-tert-butyl-ether (bio-MTBE)) were included in the assessment. Integrating a single ACS-based process enlarges the propylene cluster and results in an excess of upstream chemicals that are no longer required by the ACS processes. Still, relatively simple technologies can reduce total energy and water use, resulting in lower direct CO2emissions and water consumption of the cluster. Deploying multiple processes in parallel can drive the full defossilization of the cluster, but it requires a complete overhaul. The results illustrate the extent to which combining ACS-based processes could change the layout of an existing petrochemical cluster, affecting its performance. The paper stresses the importance of assessing such deployments, considering the existing conditions in industrial clusters.