Optimising proton stopping power ratio prediction with spectral cone-beam CT

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

David Leibold (TU Delft - RST/Medical Physics & Technology)

Dennis Schaart (Holland Proton Therapy Centre, TU Delft - RST/Medical Physics & Technology)

M.C. Goorden (TU Delft - RST/Medical Physics & Technology)

Research Group
RST/Medical Physics & Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adebd6
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
RST/Medical Physics & Technology
Issue number
14
Volume number
70
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Objective. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is used for patient positioning in proton therapy, but not directly for treatment planning due to its inferior image quality compared to fan-beam CT. One way to improve its value for proton radiotherapy might be to use CBCT setups capable of extracting spectral information, which can be realised through several hardware configurations. Here, we compare different setups w.r.t. to their capability of predicting proton stopping power ratios (SPRs). Approach. We investigate six different spectral CBCT realisations in a simulation study, namely a single-source setup with either a dual-layer detector or a photon-counting detector (PCD), a kVp-switching setup with either an energy-integrating detector (EID) or a PCD, and a dual-source setup with either EIDs or PCDs. Our figure of merit is the normalised Cramér–Rao Lower Bound (nCRLB) on SPR variance based on projection data. We take (cross)scatter into account, and compare ideal and realistic detector models to help guide future detector developments. Each setup is optimised w.r.t. source spectra, mAs ratios and energy bin settings (where applicable). Main results. Assuming a realistic detector response, setups with a kVp-switching source perform best, with the setup paired with an EID slightly outperforming the PCD-based setup (nCRLBs of 2.74 and 2.81, respectively). However, if the mAs ratio of the kVp-switching source is fixed, the performance of the kVp-switching setup with an EID is significantly degraded (nCRLB = 9.46) and outperformed by PCD-based setups, with nCRLBs of 3.27, 3.45 and 3.60 for the dual-source setup with two PCDs, the single-source setup and the kVp-switching setup with one PCD, respectively. Spectra with higher source voltage or wider spectral separation generally yield lower CRLB values, and avoiding the spectral distortion caused by charge sharing in direct-conversion PCDs promises to lower CRLB values by about a third. Significance. We present an extensive comparison of spectral CBCT setups for their application in proton radiotherapy, using a methodology that allows to compare their theoretical limit of performance without being influenced by the choice of reconstruction algorithm or the conversion scheme from Hounsfield units to SPR values.