Arctic Ocean Response to Greenland Sea Wind Anomalies in a Suite of Model Simulations

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Morven Muilwijk (University of Bergen, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research)

Mehmet Ilicak (Istanbul Technical University)

Sam B. Cornish (University of Oxford)

Sergey Danilov (Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung)

R. Gelderloos (Johns Hopkins University)

Rüdiger Gerdes (Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung)

Verena Haid (Univ. Brest/CNRS/Ifremer/IRD)

Thomas W. N. Haine (Johns Hopkins University)

Helen L. Johnson (University of Oxford)

Yavor Kostov (University of Oxford)

Tamás Kovács (University of Oxford)

Camille Lique (Univ. Brest/CNRS/Ifremer/IRD)

Juliana M. Marson (University of Alberta)

Paul G. Myers (University of Alberta)

Jeffery Scott (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of Bergen)

Lars H. Smedsrud (Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, University of Bergen, The University Centre in Svalbard)

Claude Talandier (Univ. Brest/CNRS/Ifremer/IRD)

Qiang Wang (Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung)

Affiliation
External organisation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015101
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Affiliation
External organisation
Issue number
8
Volume number
124
Pages (from-to)
6286–6322

Abstract

Multimodel Arctic Ocean “climate response function” experiments are analyzed in order to explore the effects of anomalous wind forcing over the Greenland Sea (GS) on poleward ocean heat transport, Atlantic Water (AW) pathways, and the extent of Arctic sea ice. Particular emphasis is placed on the sensitivity of the AW circulation to anomalously strong or weak GS winds in relation to natural variability, the latter manifested as part of the North Atlantic Oscillation. We find that anomalously strong (weak) GS wind forcing, comparable in strength to a strong positive (negative) North Atlantic Oscillation index, results in an intensification (weakening) of the poleward AW flow, extending from south of the North Atlantic Subpolar Gyre, through the Nordic Seas, and all the way into the Canadian Basin. Reconstructions made utilizing the calculated climate response functions explain ∼50% of the simulated AW flow variance; this is the proportion of variability that can be explained by GS wind forcing. In the Barents and Kara Seas, there is a clear relationship between the wind-driven anomalous AW inflow and the sea ice extent. Most of the anomalous AW heat is lost to the atmosphere, and loss of sea ice in the Barents Sea results in even more heat loss to the atmosphere, and thus effective ocean cooling. Release of passive tracers in a subset of the suite of models reveals differences in circulation patterns and shows that the flow of AW in the Arctic Ocean is highly dependent on the wind stress in the Nordic Seas.

No files available

Metadata only record. There are no files for this record.