A product development approach advisor for navigating common design methods, processes, and environments

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Shelby Stewart (Stevens Institute of Technology)

Jack Giambalvo (Stevens Institute of Technology)

Julia Vance (Stevens Institute of Technology)

Jeremy Faludi (TU Delft - Circular Product Design)

Steven Hoffenson (Stevens Institute of Technology)

Research Group
Circular Product Design
Copyright
© 2020 Shelby Stewart, Jack Giambalvo, Julia Vance, Jeremy Faludi, Steven Hoffenson
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/designs4010004
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Shelby Stewart, Jack Giambalvo, Julia Vance, Jeremy Faludi, Steven Hoffenson
Research Group
Circular Product Design
Issue number
1
Volume number
4
Pages (from-to)
1-28
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Many different product development approaches are taught and used in engineering and management disciplines. These formalized design methods, processes, and environments differ in the types of projects for which they are relevant, the project components they include, and the support they provide users. This paper details a review of sixteen well-established product development approaches, the development of a decision support system to help designers and managers navigate these approaches, and the administration of a survey to gather subjective assessments and feedback from design experts. The included approaches—design thinking, systems thinking, total quality management, agile development, waterfall process, engineering design, spiral model, vee model, axiomatic design, value-driven design, decision-based design, lean manufacturing, six sigma, theory of constraints, scrum, and extreme programming—are categorized based on six criteria: complexity, guidance, phase, hardware or software applicability, values, and users. A decision support system referred to as the Product Development Approach Advisor (PD Advisor) is developed to aid designers in navigating these approaches and selecting an appropriate approach based on specific project needs. Next, a survey is conducted with design experts to gather feedback on the support system and the categorization of approaches and criteria. The survey results are compared to the original classification of approaches by the authors to validate and provide feedback on the PD Advisor. The findings highlight the value and limitations of the PD Advisor for product development practice and education, as well as the opportunities for future work.

Files

Designs_04_00004.pdf
(pdf | 1.36 Mb)
License info not available