Evaluation methodologies for comparison of fusion algorithms in land mine detection

Conference paper (2002)

Authors

PBW Schwering External organisation
BA Baertlein External organisation
SP van den Broek External organisation
F Cremer ImPhys/Quantitative Imaging
Research Group
ImPhys/Quantitative Imaging
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

2002

Language

Undefined/Unknown

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Research Group

ImPhys/Quantitative Imaging

Abstract

Several sensor fusion approaches are in use for detection of land mines. These are based on different techniques and show different results. Meaningful comparisons of fusion algorithm performance are difficult, because the performance achievable may be limited by the data acquired and the sensors used. Especially in comparing such dissimilar situations, it is important to compare measures that are not dependent of sensor peculiarities or layout of test lanes. Nonetheless, a quantitative comparison of algorithms is necessary to identify the most effective fusion techniques. This comparison must sometimes be done when the algorithms are being applied to different data sets. In this paper we describe a methodology to evaluate the performance of sensor-fused mine-detection systems. This process can be used to compare different minedetecting sensors in well-defined scenarios.

Keywords: Mine detection, sensor fusion, test and evaluation methodologies, system design.