Timing of advance care planning in patients with advanced cancer

Analysis of ACTION data

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Tingting Zhu (Erasmus MC)

Judith AC Rietjens (Erasmus MC, TU Delft - DesIgning Value in Ecosystems)

Johannes J.M. van Delden ( University Medical Centre Utrecht)

Luc Deliens (Universiteit Gent, Vrije Universiteit Brussel)

Agnes van der Heide (Erasmus MC)

Anna Thit Johnsen (Zealand University Hospital)

Francesca Ingravallo (University of Bologna)

Urška Lunder (University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik)

Nancy J. Preston (Lancaster University)

undefined More Authors

Research Group
DesIgning Value in Ecosystems
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2025.108761
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
DesIgning Value in Ecosystems
Journal title
Patient Education and Counseling
Volume number
136
Article number
108761
Downloads counter
264
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Objective
To explore the experiences of patients with advanced cancer regarding the timing of ACP.

Methods
This secondary analysis used data from the ACTION cluster-randomized clinical trial. 288 patients with advanced lung or colorectal cancer, WHO performance status 0–3, and with a minimum life expectancy of 3 months were included in this analysis.

Results
The mean time between patients’ cancer diagnosis and the first ACP conversation was 15.3 months (SD:19.4). The average duration from current cancer stage diagnosis to the first conversation was 8.9 months (SD:10.7). The timing of the conversation was perceived as “just right” by 217 (75.3 %) of the patients. Patients who perceived the timing as “too early” were more recently diagnosed with cancer (9.1 months) or with their current cancer stage (5.7 months) than those who did not. Patients perceiving the timing as “too late” had shorter estimated survival times.

Conclusion
Patients with advanced cancer may benefit from earlier ACP than what is currently typically initiated in clinical practice.

Practice implications
When initiating ACP conversations, several aspects should be considered, including patients’ gender, their socio-cultural environment, and their ability to perform daily activities, with or without limitations.