Perceived involvement in emergency department care

An observational study of nurse-led bedside shift handover

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

M. C. Van Der Linden (Haaglanden Medical Center)

R. Oueslati (De Haagse Hogeschool, Leiden University Medical Center)

A. R. C. Lam (Haaglanden Medical Center)

H. Krapels (Haaglanden Medical Center)

S. Van Vliet (Haaglanden Medical Center)

A. De Graaf (Student TU Delft)

N. Van Der Linden (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Policy Analysis
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101739 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Policy Analysis
Journal title
International Emergency Nursing
Volume number
84
Article number
101739
Downloads counter
15
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background
Involving patients in their care is an important aspect of quality emergency nursing, but remains difficult to achieve in busy and time-pressured settings. Bedside shift handover (BSH), where nurses exchange information in the patient’s presence, may support engagement, yet evidence from emergency departments (EDs) is limited.

Aim
To explore how patients perceived their involvement in communication and care during their ED stay, and whether exposure to nurse-led BSH, structured using the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (SBAR) format, was associated with higher perceived involvement.

Methods
A cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted among 104 recently discharged ED patients. Perceived involvement was assessed with the three-item CollaboRATE questionnaire. Additional data included patient and visit characteristics, crowding levels, and BSH exposure based on nursing documentation.

Results
Patients reported moderate-to-high perceived involvement (mean CollaboRATE 21.8 of 27), though only 11.5 % gave top scores across all items. BSH was documented in 36 % of eligible cases. No significant association was observed between documented BSH and perceived involvement (p = 0.81), nor between crowding and involvement (r = –.05, p = 0.59).

Conclusion
Most patients felt involved, yet optimal engagement was uncommon. No association was found between BSH and perceived involvement, likely reflecting variation in implementation. Consistent and inclusive handover practices may help support patient engagement, but this requires further study.

Files

Taverne
warning

File under embargo until 06-07-2026