Pore-scale analysis of hydrogen-water displacement in sandstones
a comparison of pore-network modelling and flow visualisation experiments
Zaid Jangda (Heriot-Watt University)
Tom Bultreys (Universiteit Gent)
Zeyun Jiang (Heriot-Watt University)
Sajjad Foroughi (Imperial College London)
Hannah Menke (Heriot-Watt University)
Andreas Busch (Heriot-Watt University)
Sebastian Geiger (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)
Kamaljit Singh (Heriot-Watt University)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Hydrogen–water displacement in porous rocks involves capillary-dominated multiphase-flow processes at the pore scale that are critical for understanding fluid distribution, trapping, and recovery behaviour. Three-dimensional pore-scale flow visualisation experiments provide direct insight into these processes but are resource intensive and technically challenging. Pore-network models offer a computationally efficient alternative for simulating capillary-dominated multiphase flow, but their accuracy depends on how well-simplified displacement rules represent real pore-scale behaviour. This work presents a direct pore-by-pore comparison between experimentally observed displacement events and predictions from a quasi-static pore-network model. The comparison enables evaluation of the model’s simplifying assumptions and its ability to reproduce pore-scale displacement behaviour across contrasting rock types, including a homogeneous Bentheimer sandstone and a layered Clashach sandstone. The model was calibrated to match experimental end-state saturations, and its performance was evaluated using spatial saturation distributions and pore-occupancy statistics. The pore-network model shows good agreement with experimental observations for the homogeneous rock, particularly during drainage. It is subsequently used to analyse additional scenarios, including cyclic hydrogen injection and withdrawal and wettability variations, providing insight into capillary pressure behaviour and residual saturation trends. In contrast, for the heterogeneous rock, the model does not fully capture the trapping and fluid redistribution observed experimentally, indicating limitations in representing fine-scale heterogeneity. Overall, the results identify the conditions under which the quasi-static pore-network model can reliably represent hydrogen–water displacement and where its simplifying assumptions become limiting, providing guidance for its application in pore-scale multiphase-flow research.
help_outline