Generalized Belief Propagation Algorithms for Decoding of Surface Codes

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Josias Old (RWTH Aachen University, Forschungszentrum Jülich)

Manuel Rispler (RWTH Aachen University, Forschungszentrum Jülich, TU Delft - QCD/Terhal Group, TU Delft - QuTech Advanced Research Centre)

Research Institute
QuTech Advanced Research Centre
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-06-07-1037 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Research Institute
QuTech Advanced Research Centre
Volume number
7
Article number
1037
Downloads counter
160
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Belief propagation (BP) is well-known as a low complexity decoding algorithm with a strong performance for important classes of quantum error correcting codes, e.g. notably for the quantum low-density parity check (LDPC) code class of random expander codes. However, it is also well-known that the performance of BP breaks down when facing topological codes such as the surface code, where naive BP fails entirely to reach a below-threshold regime, i.e. the regime where error correction becomes useful. Previous works have shown, that this can be remedied by resorting to post-processing decoders outside the framework of BP. In this work, we present a generalized belief propagation method with an outer re-initialization loop that successfully decodes surface codes, i.e. opposed to naive BP it recovers the sub-threshold regime known from decoders tailored to the surface code and from statistical-mechanical mappings. We report a threshold of 17% under independent bit-and phase-flip data noise (to be compared to the ideal threshold of 20.6%) and a threshold value of 14% under depolarizing data noise (compared to the ideal threshold of 18.9%), which are on par with thresholds achieved by non-BP post-processing methods.