A novel method for monitoring abdominal compliance to optimize insufflation pressure during laparoscopy

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Frank Sterke (Erasmus MC, TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Willem van Weteringen (Erasmus MC)

Lorenzo Ventura (Politecnico di Milano, Erasmus MC)

Ilaria Milesi (Politecnico di Milano)

René M.H. Wijnen (Erasmus MC)

John Vlot (Erasmus MC)

Raffaele L. Dellacà (Politecnico di Milano)

Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09406-4
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Issue number
9
Volume number
36
Pages (from-to)
7066-7074
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background: Abdominal compliance describes the ease of expansion of the abdominal cavity. Several studies highlighted the importance of monitoring abdominal compliance (Cab) during the creation of laparoscopic workspace to individualize the insufflation pressure. The lack of validated clinical monitoring tools for abdominal compliance prevents accurate tailoring of insufflation pressure. Oscillometry, also known as the forced oscillation technique (FOT), is currently used to measure respiratory mechanics and has the potential to be adapted for monitoring abdominal compliance. This study aimed to define, develop and evaluate a novel approach which can monitor abdominal compliance during laparoscopy using endoscopic oscillometry. Materials and methods: Endoscopic oscillometry was evaluated in a porcine model for laparoscopy. A custom-built insufflator was developed for applying an oscillatory pressure signal superimposed onto a mean intra-abdominal pressure. This insufflator was used to measure the abdominal compliance at insufflation pressures ranging from 5 to 20 hPa (3.75 to 15 mmHg). The measurements were compared to the static abdominal compliance, which was measured simultaneously with computed tomography imaging. Results: Endoscopic oscillometry recordings and CT images were obtained in 10 subjects, resulting in 76 measurement pairs for analysis. The measured dynamic Cab ranged between 0.0216 and 0.261 L/hPa while the static Cab based on the CT imaging ranged between 0.0318 and 0.364 L/hPa. The correlation showed a polynomial relation and the adjusted R-squared was 97.1%. Conclusions: Endoscopic oscillometry can be used to monitor changes in abdominal compliance during laparoscopic surgery, which was demonstrated in this study with a comparison with CT imaging in a porcine laparoscopy model. Use of this technology to personalize the insufflation pressure could reduce the risk of applying excessive pressure and limit the drawbacks of insufflation.