Analyzing the Impact of Evolving Combustion Conditions on the Composition of Wildfire Emissions Using Satellite Data

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Lindsey D. Anderson (University of Colorado - Boulder)

Barbara Dix (University of Colorado - Boulder)

Jordan Schnell (University of Colorado - Boulder, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)

Robert Yokelson (University of Montana)

J. Pepijn Veefkind (Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), TU Delft - Atmospheric Remote Sensing)

Ravan Ahmadov (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)

Joost de Gouw (University of Colorado - Boulder)

Research Group
Atmospheric Remote Sensing
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105811
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Research Group
Atmospheric Remote Sensing
Issue number
23
Volume number
50
Article number
e2023GL105811
Downloads counter
325
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Wildfires have become larger and more frequent because of climate change, increasing their impact on air pollution. Air quality forecasts and climate models do not currently account for changes in the composition of wildfire emissions during the commonly observed progression from more flaming to smoldering combustion. Laboratory measurements have consistently shown decreased nitrogen dioxide (NO2) relative to carbon monoxide (CO) over time, as they transitioned from more flaming to smoldering combustion, while formaldehyde (HCHO) relative to CO remained constant. Here, we show how daily ratios between column densities of NO2 versus those of CO and HCHO versus CO from the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) changed for large wildfires in the Western United States. TROPOMI-derived emission ratios were lower than those from the laboratory. We discuss reasons for the discrepancies, including how representative laboratory burns are of wildfires, the effect of aerosols on trace gas retrievals, and atmospheric chemistry in smoke plumes.