Ion Exchange as Pretreatment of Municipal Wastewater Effluent for Reverse Osmosis Desalination

Abstract

Biofouling and scaling are ongoing challenges for reverse osmosis (RO) membranes application in wastewater reclamation. Adequate RO feed pretreatment is necessary for biofouling and scaling control. The objective of this thesis was evaluated the effectiveness of ion exchange treatment with weak acid cation (WAC) and strong base anion (SBA) resins columns, in series, after ultrafiltration (UF) treatment for the pretreatment of municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent in order to be used for RO desalination. Specifically, the performance of two SBA resins, the Amberlite SCAV4 Cl (SCAV4) and the Amberlite IRA458 Cl (IRA458) was assessed at three regeneration levels (120, 100 and 80 g NaCl/Lr). The effect of the different regeneration levels on anions removal (sulfate, phosphate and nitrate), total organic carbon (TOC) removal and the operational exchange capacity was researched. Moreover, the subsequent effect on RO biofouling and scaling potential was investigated based on the product water quality of the two SBA resins with bio-growth potential tests and software tests (WAVE design, PHREEQC 3 and Avista Ci), respectively. Phosphate and sulfate removal was above 97% for both resins at all regeneration levels. TOC removal of about 70% was achieved in all cases. It was also observed that sulfate, phosphate and TOC removal remained the same up to the point where product nitrate concentration reached its feed concentration. The removal of nitrate was influenced by the regeneration level. For both SBA resins, a lower regeneration level caused a higher nitrate baseline leakage in product water, hence to a lower removal. The macroporous SCAV4 found to have higher selectivity towards nitrate compared to the gel IRA458. Nevertheless, the anion selectivity order for both SCAV4 and IRA458 was HCO3- < NO3- < HPO42- < SO42-. A minor increase in the operational exchange capacity for both SBA resins was observed at higher regeneration levels. Overall, the influence of the different regeneration levels was found to be limited towards the product water quality and the operational exchange capacity. Also, both SBA resins resulted to similar product water quality. The operational exchange capacity of IRA458 at each regeneration level was higher than that of SCAV4, due to the former’s greater total exchange capacity. The RO feed water quality produced without ion exchange pretreatment (only UF) supported bacterial growth up to 54 ± 1.5 × 106 cells/mL. The RO feed water qualities produced with ion exchange pretreatment in the cases of SCAV4 and IRA458 supported bacterial growth up to 3.4 ± 0.3 × 106 cells/mL and to 1.25 ± 0.2 × 106 cells/mL, respectively. The resulted reduction in the bacterial growth potential was above 90% after ion exchange treatment with either one of the tested SBA resins. The growth-limiting nutrient for the RO feed water qualities produced by either SBA resin was phosphorus. The bacterial growth supported by the two RO feed water qualities produced with ion exchange pretreatment after extra phosphorus addition was 80% lower than that supported by the RO feed water quality produced without ion exchange. This difference suggests that both SBA resins removed a considerable fraction of assimilable organic carbon (AOC). It was concluded that ion exchange pretreatment with either one of the tested SBA resins resulted in nutrients removal (P and C) in the RO feed that lowers the biofouling potential compared to RO feed pretreatment with only UF. The software results suggest lower scaling potential for several scalant types in the RO feed after ion exchange treatment with either one of the tested SBA resins. Among them was calcium phosphate, which was found to have high scaling potential in RO feed without ion exchange treatment (only UF) either with or without anti-scalant dosing. However, the scaling potential of some silica and iron based minerals was high, thus anti-scalant dosing might be required.