Understanding sediment bypassing processes through analysis of high-frequency observations of Ameland Inlet, the Netherlands

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

E. P.L. Elias (Deltares-USA)

Ad J.F. Van der Spek (Universiteit Utrecht, Deltares)

S.G. Pearson (Deltares, TU Delft - Coastal Engineering)

Jelmer Cleveringa (ARCADIS Nederland)

Research Group
Coastal Engineering
Copyright
© 2019 Edwin P.L. Elias, A.J.F. van der Spek, S.G. Pearson, Jelmer Cleveringa
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2019.06.001
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 Edwin P.L. Elias, A.J.F. van der Spek, S.G. Pearson, Jelmer Cleveringa
Related content
Research Group
Coastal Engineering
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Volume number
415
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Ameland inlet is centrally located in the chain of West Frisian Islands (the Netherlands). A globally unique dataset of detailed bathymetric charts starting in the early 19th century, and high-resolution digital data since 1986 allows for detailed investigations of the ebb-tidal delta morphodynamics and sediment bypassing over a wide range of scales. The ebb-tidal delta exerts a large influence on the updrift and downdrift shorelines, leading to periodic growth and decay (net erosion) of the updrift (Terschelling) island tip, while sequences of sediment bypassing result in shoal attachment to the downdrift coastline of Ameland. Distinct differences in location, shape and volume of the attachment shoals result from differences in sediment bypassing, which can be driven by morphodynamic interactions at the large scale of the inlet system (O(10 km)), and through interactions that originate at the smallest scale of individual shoal instabilities (O(0.1 km)). Such shoal instabilities would not be considered to affect the ebb-tidal delta and inlet dynamics as a whole, but as we have shown in this paper, they can trigger a new sediment bypassing cycle and result in complete relocation of channels and shoals. These subtle dynamics are difficult, if not impossible, to capture in existing general conceptual models and empirical relationships. These differences are, however, essential for understanding tidal inlet and channel morphodynamics and hence coastal management.

Files

1_s2.0_S0025322718304997_main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 10.7 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 04-12-2019
License info not available