CF-PEEK vs. Titanium Dental Implants: Stress Distribution and Fatigue Performance in Variable Bone Qualities

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Nurdan Polat Sagsöz (Atatürk University)

Fahri Murat (Erzurum Technical University)

Sema Nur Sevinç Gül (Atatürk University)

A.T. ŞENSOY (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering, Samsun University)

Irfan Kaymaz (Erzurum Technical University)

Research Group
Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10090619 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics
Journal title
Biomimetics
Issue number
9
Volume number
10
Article number
619
Downloads counter
18
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of titanium and carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF-PEEK) dental implants under varying bone densities and loading conditions using finite element analysis (FEA). A single-tooth mandibular molar implant system was modeled, comprising titanium or CF-PEEK abutment and fixture, and surrounding bone structures with four configurations: (I) fully cortical bone, (II) 2 mm cortical layer with trabecular bone, (III) 1 mm cortical with high-density trabecular bone, and (IV) 1 mm cortical with low-density trabecular bone. Vertical and oblique static loads of 100 N were applied to simulate masticatory forces. FEA results revealed that titanium implants exhibited higher von Mises stress values in the implant and abutment under oblique loading, exceeding 400 MPa, while CF-PEEK components showed reduced stress but significantly higher strain levels. Cortical and trabecular bone surrounding CF-PEEK implants received more uniform stress distribution, potentially minimizing stress shielding effects. However, fatigue life analyses indicated that CF-PEEK abutment and screw components were more susceptible to mechanical failure under oblique loads, particularly in low-density bone models. In conclusion, CF-PEEK implants offer a more physiological load transfer to bone and reduced stress shielding compared to titanium. However, their structural reliability under complex loading, especially in low-quality bone conditions, requires careful consideration. These findings support the potential use of CF-PEEK in select clinical scenarios but highlight the need for further material and design optimization.