Land Consumption and Land Take: Enhancing Conceptual Clarity for Evaluating Spatial Governance in the EU Context
Elisabeth Marquard (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ)
Stephan Bartke (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ)
Judith Gifreu i Font (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)
Alois Humer (University of Vienna)
Arend Jonkman (TU Delft - Housing Institutions & Governance)
Evelin Jürgenson (Estonian University of Life Sciences)
Naja Marot (University of Ljubljana)
Lien Poelmans (Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek)
Blaž Repe (University of Ljubljana)
Robert Rybski (University of Warsaw)
Christoph Schröter-Schlaack (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ)
Jaroslava Sobocká (National Agriculture and Food Centre)
Michael Tophøj Sørensen (Aalborg University)
Eliška Vejchodská (Jan Evangelista Purkyně University, Charles University)
Athena Yiannakou (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
Jana Bovet (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Rapid expansion of settlements and related infrastructures is a global trend that comes with severe environmental, economic, and social costs. Steering urbanization toward well-balanced compactness is thus acknowledged as an important strategic orientation in UN Sustainable Development Goal 11 (SDG-11) via the SDG-indicator “Ratio of land consumption rate to population growth rate.” The EU’s simultaneous commitment to being “a frontrunner in implementing […] the SDGs” and to striving for “no net land take until 2050” calls for relating the concepts of land consumption and land take to each other. Drawing on an EU-centred questionnaire study, a focus group and a literature review, we scrutinize definitions of land consumption and land take, seeking to show how they are interrelated, and questioning the comparability of respective indicators. We argue that conceptual clarifications and a bridging of the two notions are much needed, and that the precision required for definitions and applications is context-dependent. While approximate understandings may suffice for general communication and dissemination objectives, accurate and consistent interpretations of the discussed concepts seem indispensable for monitoring and reporting purposes. We propose ways of addressing existing ambiguities and suggest prioritizing the term land take in the EU context. Thereby, we aim to enhance conceptual clarity around land consumption and land take—a precondition for solidly informing respective policies and decisions.