Multi-criteria-decision-making framework using ecosystem-services for an integral design of vertical greenery systems

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Dieuwertje Bakker-den Hartog (Urban Matter Concepts Consultancy, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions (AMS))

Martijn Lugten (Urban Matter Concepts Consultancy, TU Delft - Environmental Technology and Design, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions (AMS))

M. Ottelé (TU Delft - Materials and Environment, Urban Matter Concepts Consultancy)

Research Group
Environmental Technology and Design
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128931
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Environmental Technology and Design
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository as part of the Taverne amendment. More information about this copyright law amendment can be found at https://www.openaccess.nl. Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Volume number
112
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Vertical greenery systems (VGS) are recognized for providing a range of ecosystem services (ESS), including biodiversity enhancement, property value increase, and stormwater management. However, there are significant challenges in comparing VGS designs due to the lack of standardized metrics and the limited understanding of their integrated performance across multiple ESS. This study introduces a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to assess and compare the full spectrum of ESS provided by VGS. Through an extensive literature search, VGS typologies, system components, and performance metrics were identified for ESS and synthesized. The application of the MCDM model was tested in a case study, showcasing its potential for improving decision-making and selection of VGS designs. Findings from the literature review stress a need for standardizing research methods, improving data quantification, and explaining and modelling ESS interactions. The study concludes that the MCDM framework supports context-specific evaluations, while further refinement is needed to reduce subjectivity and to include emerging ESS. These approaches are critical for advancing both research and practical applications in green infrastructure.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 24-12-2025