Numerical analysis of multiple phase change materials based heat sink with angled thermal conductivity enhancer

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Muthamil Selvan Nedumaran (National Institute of Technology Karnataka)

Gnanasekaran Nagarajan (National Institute of Technology Karnataka)

Kamel Hooman (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Department
Process and Energy
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105316 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Department
Process and Energy
Volume number
55
Article number
105316
Downloads counter
287
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Phase change materials (PCM) RT-28HC, RT-35HC, and RT-44HC with three different melting temperatures, 29 °C, 36 °C, and 44 °C, with similar thermal properties, are considered. The PCM is oriented from the left to right side of the heat sink in its increasing order. The fins are attached to the heat sink longitudinally, and its orientation effects are studied low (100–500 W/m2) and high (1000–5000 W/m2) heat fluxes applied on the horizontal bottom surface of the heat sink. A 2D model is developed using ANSYS Fluent 19, and the fin orientation effects are investigated numerically. The orientation of fins at different angles such as 0°, +15°, +30°, +45°, +60°,-15°,-30°,-45°, −60° are considered. The effect of fins on the charging cycle is assessed by comparing a single and double PCM heat sink. Three initial conditions are investigated by altering the initial temperature 300 K, 303 K, and 310 K. At increasing heat input, the negative angled fins possess a higher melting rate. For different initial conditions, −60° provides higher enhancement, and +60° possesses prolonged melting for almost all cases. The performance of a triple PCM design is compared with single and double PCM counterparts under similar conditions.