Moral Judgement and Moral Progress

The Problem of Cognitive Control

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Michael Klenk (TU Delft - Values Technology and Innovation, TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

Hanno Sauer (Universiteit Utrecht)

Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Copyright
© 2021 M.B.O.T. Klenk, Hanno Sauer
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2021.1931670
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 M.B.O.T. Klenk, Hanno Sauer
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Issue number
7
Volume number
34
Pages (from-to)
938-961
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

We propose a fundamental challenge to the feasibility of moral progress: most extant theories of progress, we will argue, assume an unrealistic level of cognitive control people must have over their moral judgments for moral progress to occur. Moral progress depends at least in part on the possibility of individual people improving their moral cognition to eliminate the pernicious influence of various epistemically defective biases and other distorting factors. Since the degree of control people can exert over their moral cognition tends to be significantly overestimated, the prospects of moral progress face a formidable problem, the force of which has thus far been underappreciated. In the paper, we will provide both conceptual and empirical arguments for this thesis, and explain its most important implications.