Institutional influences on transitions in water management

A comparison between Dutch and Flemish river management plans

Conference Paper (2025)
Author(s)

Heleen Vreugdenhil (Deltares, TU Delft - Policy Analysis)

Jort de Vries (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Deltares)

Research Group
Policy Analysis
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Policy Analysis
Pages (from-to)
112-113
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

To support the transition to integrated, naturebased river-basin management, institutions supporting such strategies and practices need to be established while existing institutions hindering the transition need to be gradually broken down and replaced (Fig. 1). Institutions play a vital role in transitions since they are the rules which determine the range of acceptable behaviour in society and how interactions are organised (North, 1990). This study draws lessons from the influence of different institutional frameworks in transitions towards nature-based river management by comparing institutional developments in the Dutch "Room for the River” programme and the Flemish “Plan Sigma”.

Files

License info not available