Electrical Impedance Tomography as a monitoring tool during weaning from mechanical ventilation

an observational study during the spontaneous breathing trial

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

J. J. Wisse (Erasmus MC)

T. G. Goos (Erasmus MC, TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Annemijn H. Jonkman (TU Delft - Biomechanical Engineering, Erasmus MC)

Peter Somhorst (Erasmus MC)

I.K.M. Reiss (Erasmus MC)

Henrik Endeman (Erasmus MC)

Diederik Gommers (Erasmus MC)

Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-02801-6
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Issue number
1
Volume number
25
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background: Prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation is associated with poor clinical outcome. Therefore, choosing the right moment for weaning and extubation is essential. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a promising innovative lung monitoring technique, but its role in supporting weaning decisions is yet uncertain. We aimed to evaluate physiological trends during a T-piece spontaneous breathing trail (SBT) as measured with EIT and the relation between EIT parameters and SBT success or failure. Methods: This is an observational study in which twenty-four adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation performed an SBT. EIT monitoring was performed around the SBT. Multiple EIT parameters including the end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI), delta Tidal Impedance (ΔZ), Global Inhomogeneity index (GI), Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBIEIT), Respiratory Rate (RREIT) and Minute Ventilation (MVEIT) were computed on a breath-by-breath basis from stable tidal breathing periods. Results: EELI values dropped after the start of the SBT (p < 0.001) and did not recover to baseline after restarting mechanical ventilation. The ΔZ dropped (p < 0.001) but restored to baseline within seconds after restarting mechanical ventilation. Five patients failed the SBT, the GI (p = 0.01) and transcutaneous CO2 (p < 0.001) values significantly increased during the SBT in patients who failed the SBT compared to patients with a successful SBT. Conclusion: EIT has the potential to assess changes in ventilation distribution and quantify the inhomogeneity of the lungs during the SBT. High lung inhomogeneity was found during SBT failure. Insight into physiological trends for the individual patient can be obtained with EIT during weaning from mechanical ventilation, but its role in predicting weaning failure requires further study.