Megascape Symbiosis

From megaprojects as the catalyst of urban development to a symbiotic model of self-directed territories in the GBA’s peripheries

Student Report (2024)
Author(s)

J.C. Hoogeveen (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Yi-An Lu

L.C.C. Postma (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

V.I. van Staveren van Dijk (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

M. Sutherland (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

E. Vamvakousi (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Contributor(s)

L. Lei – Mentor (TU Delft - Spatial Planning and Strategy)

Diego Andres Sepulveda Carmona – Mentor (TU Delft - Spatial Planning and Strategy)

G. Bracken – Mentor (TU Delft - Spatial Planning and Strategy)

Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Graduation Date
30-06-2024
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Architecture, Urbanism and Building Sciences']
Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

As one of the most open and economically vibrant regions in China, the Greater Bay Area plays a significant strategic role in the country’s overall development, showcasing the power of urban transformation within a diverse and sociopolitically rich region. Since China’s economic reform in 1978, mega projects and world-leading developments in the region have driven rapid urbanization. Despite these achievements, rapid globalization has led to negative effects on ecology and pollution in the GBA. When paired with climate change and deltaic conditions, these issues create “double-negative” effects on various layers.

Using the concept of “state entrepreneurialism” as a starting point, this project explores the role of urban mega developments in realizing the state’s strategic and political objectives. It critiques the existing top-down, marketdriven
governance model and advocates for a paradigm shift towards localized planning approaches. These dynamics create tensions in soft locations, areas in transition which are susceptible to change and speculation.

This report outlines the shift from using megaprojects as catalysts for urban development to a more holistic framework. This new approach frames “megascapes” of place-bound strategic interventions that foster complementary relations and shifts focus from big urban cores to their surrounding territories. We define megascapes as self-directed territories consisting of functional conglomerations that respond to local sensitivities and transformations, proposing a future where soft peripheral territories are integrated into the GBA’s broader regionalization model. This vision emphasizes adaptable, place-bound development and enhanced relations between ecological and economic systems to foster sustainable urban growth.

Files

License info not available