Semi-automated background removal limits data loss and normalizes imaging mass cytometry data

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Marieke E. Ijsselsteijn (Leiden University Medical Center)

Antonios Somarakis (Leiden University Medical Center)

BPF Lelieveldt (Leiden University Medical Center)

T. Höllt (TU Delft - Computer Graphics and Visualisation, Leiden University Medical Center)

Noel F. C. C. De Miranda (Leiden University Medical Center)

Research Group
Computer Graphics and Visualisation
Copyright
© 2021 Marieke E. Ijsselsteijn, Antonios Somarakis, B.P.F. Lelieveldt, T. Höllt, Noel F. C. C. de Miranda
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24480
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 Marieke E. Ijsselsteijn, Antonios Somarakis, B.P.F. Lelieveldt, T. Höllt, Noel F. C. C. de Miranda
Research Group
Computer Graphics and Visualisation
Issue number
12
Volume number
99
Pages (from-to)
1187-1197
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) allows the detection of multiple antigens (approximately 40 markers) combined with spatial information, making it a unique tool for the evaluation of complex biological systems. Due to its widespread availability and retained tissue morphology, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are often a material of choice for IMC studies. However, antibody performance and signal to noise ratios can differ considerably between FFPE tissues as a consequence of variations in tissue processing, including fixation. In contrast to batch effects caused by differences in the immunodetection procedure, variations in tissue processing are difficult to control. We investigated the effect of immunodetection-related signal intensity fluctuations on IMC analysis and phenotype identification, in a cohort of 12 colorectal cancer tissues. Furthermore, we explored different normalization strategies and propose a workflow to normalize IMC data by semi-automated background removal, using publicly available tools. This workflow can be directly applied to previously acquired datasets and considerably improves the quality of IMC data, thereby supporting the analysis and comparison of multiple samples.