Escape theory

Explaining a negative motivation to travel

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

GP Wee (TU Delft - Transport and Logistics)

Patricia Mokhtarian (Georgia Institute of Technology)

Research Group
Transport and Logistics
Copyright
© 2023 G.P. van Wee, Patricia Mokhtarian
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103603
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 G.P. van Wee, Patricia Mokhtarian
Research Group
Transport and Logistics
Volume number
169
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In this paper we assume that people could travel in some cases to escape from something, such as their family, colleagues, or residential or work area. The concept of escaping as a driver to travel complements both the mainstream assumption that travel is a derived demand and the idea that people sometimes travel for the fun of it (and thus derive a positive utility from travelling), and has its origin in sociological literature. We categorize forms of escaping, and link travel to escape (TtE) to other concepts such as travel time budgets. Next we propose a first conceptual model relating factors explaining the motivation for escaping from something, or being able to escape from something, and the subsequent travel behaviour. We then formalize the travel behaviour model with general functions incorporating the role of travel to escape. Next we present the results of a first, small, empirical study showing that some people recognize the concept of escaping. In addition, we discuss the implications of travel motivated by escaping from something, one implication being that there will be more travel than if the concept does not apply, and another implication being the potentially positive value of a low level of accessibility, rather than the high level customarily assumed to be more desirable. We finally discuss implications for future research, and end with a discussion and final conclusion.