Preferences toward bus alternatives in rural areas of the netherlands

A stated choice experiment

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Kristel Bronsvoort (TU Delft - Transport and Logistics)

María Alonso González (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

N. van Oort (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

E.J.E. Molin (TU Delft - Transport and Logistics)

Serge Hoogendoorn (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Transport and Planning
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211029919
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Transport and Planning
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public. @en
Issue number
12
Volume number
2675
Pages (from-to)
524-533
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Public transport in rural areas is under pressure because demand is low and dispersed. To reduce costs, flexible and on-demand services are often proposed as alternatives for conventional bus services. Conventional services are generally not suitable for rural areas, because the demand is low and dispersed. In this paper, a stated preference survey is designed to identify the preferences of rural bus users for alternative services. Other than the traditional bus, two other modes are included in this study: a demand responsive transport (DRT) service and an express bus service with bike-sharing services for last mile transport. Given the on-demand nature of these alternatives, flexibility-and reliability-related attributes are included in the stated preference survey. The results from the choice model indicate that the reliability and flexibility aspects do not have a large effect on the preference for the on-demand alternatives. Instead, cost, access and egress times, and in-vehicle time play a bigger role in individuals’ preferences toward the different alternatives. A sensitivity analysis shows that changes in the operational characteristics can make the on-demand alternatives more attractive. However, many bus users still prefer the conventional bus service over the on-demand alternatives.

Files

Bronsvoort-et-al-2021-preferen... (pdf)
(pdf | 1.08 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 21-02-2022
License info not available