Plots, murders, and money

oversight bodies evaluating the effectiveness of surveillance technology

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

M.R. Cayford (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science, University of Washington)

Wolter Pieters (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Constant Hijzen (Universiteit Leiden)

Safety and Security Science
Copyright
© 2018 M.R. Cayford, W. Pieters, Constant Hijzen
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2018.1487159
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 M.R. Cayford, W. Pieters, Constant Hijzen
Safety and Security Science
Issue number
7
Volume number
33
Pages (from-to)
999-1021
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Intelligence agencies routinely use surveillance technology to perform surveillance on digital data. This practice raises many questions that feed a societal debate, including whether the surveillance technology is effective in achieving the given security goal, whether it is cost-efficient, and whether it is proportionate. Oversight bodies are important actors in this debate, overseeing budgets, legal and privacy matters, and the performance of intelligence agencies. This paper examines how oversight bodies evaluate the questions above, using documents produced by American and British oversight mechanisms.