Comparing Cryo-EM Reconstructions and Validating Atomic Model Fit Using Difference Maps

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Agnel Praveen Joseph (Hartree Centre)

Ingvar Lagerstedt (Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton)

Arjen J. Jakobi (Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft, TU Delft - BN/Arjen Jakobi Lab)

Tom Burnley (Hartree Centre)

Ardan Patwardhan (Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton)

Maya Topf (University of London)

Martyn Winn (Hartree Centre)

Research Group
BN/Arjen Jakobi Lab
Copyright
© 2020 Agnel Praveen Joseph, Ingvar Lagerstedt, A. Jakobi, Tom Burnley, Ardan Patwardhan, Maya Topf, Martyn Winn
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01103
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Agnel Praveen Joseph, Ingvar Lagerstedt, A. Jakobi, Tom Burnley, Ardan Patwardhan, Maya Topf, Martyn Winn
Research Group
BN/Arjen Jakobi Lab
Issue number
5
Volume number
60
Pages (from-to)
2552-2560
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is a powerful technique for determining structures of multiple conformational or compositional states of macromolecular assemblies involved in cellular processes. Recent technological developments have led to a leap in the resolution of many cryo-EM data sets, making atomic model building more common for data interpretation. We present a method for calculating differences between two cryo-EM maps or a map and a fitted atomic model. The proposed approach works by scaling the maps using amplitude matching in resolution shells. To account for variability in local resolution of cryo-EM data, we include a procedure for local amplitude scaling that enables appropriate scaling of local map contrast. The approach is implemented as a user-friendly tool in the CCP-EM software package. To obtain clean and interpretable differences, we propose a protocol involving steps to process the input maps and output differences. We demonstrate the utility of the method for identifying conformational and compositional differences including ligands. We also highlight the use of difference maps for evaluating atomic model fit in cryo-EM maps.