Transferring Moral Responsibility for Technological Hazards

The Case of GMOs in Agriculture

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

Z.H. Robaey (TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

Copyright
© 2016 Z.H. Robaey
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9636-5
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 Z.H. Robaey
Issue number
5
Volume number
29
Pages (from-to)
767-786
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The use of genetically modified organisms in agriculture makes great promises of better seeds, but also raises many controversies about ownership of seeds and about potential hazards. I suggest that owners of these seeds bear the responsibility to do no harm in using these seeds. After defining the nature of this responsibility, this paper asks, if ownership entails moral responsibility, and ownership can be transferred, then how is moral responsibility transferred? Building on the literature on use plans, I suggest five conditions for a good transfer of moral responsibility for genetically modified seeds. I also look at the Monsanto Technology Use Guide and Technology/Stewardship Agreement, as an examplar of a use plan, to explore the extent to which these conditions are present. I conclude that use plans can play a role in the distribution and transfer of moral responsibility for technologies with high benefits and potential harmful uncertainties.