Nature-based solutions for coastal protection based on intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Dong Jiing Doong (National Cheng Kung University)

Yu Chen Lee (National Cheng Kung University, TU Delft - Team Raf Van de Plas)

Peter Fröhle (Hamburg University of Technology)

Zoran Vojinovic (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

Cheng Hui Liao (National Cheng Kung University)

Research Group
Team Raf Van de Plas
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2026.104988
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Team Raf Van de Plas
Journal title
Coastal Engineering
Volume number
208
Article number
104988
Downloads counter
5
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Nature-based Solutions (NbS) use natural processes to address social, economic, and environmental challenges, including climate change, and this study explores their application for coastal protection. Before the actual implementation of NbS structures, co-creation with stakeholders to identify and assess potential NbS solutions for the selected local site is essential. However, existing frameworks for selecting NbS measures in coastal protection remain limited in handling the complex interactions among multiple indicators and the inherent uncertainty in expert evaluations. To address this gap, we develop an integrated assessment framework specifically for NbS in coastal protection. We first identified 18 distinct coastal protection measures through literature reviews. The proposed framework combines the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) and entropy-based intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS (IF-TOPSIS) to facilitate expert-driven multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), both of which use fuzzy theory to address uncertainty and ambiguity in expert judgments. The 18 consensus indicators from an initial pool of 63 evaluation indicators are obtained in FDM analysis. Subsequently, IF-TOPSIS is applied to rank the 18 measures against these evaluation indicators based on membership, non-membership, and hesitancy degrees. The proposed framework is demonstrated through a case study at the Golden Coast, Tainan, Taiwan to illustrate its practical applicability.

Files

Taverne
warning

File under embargo until 26-08-2026