Stewardship of global collective behavior

Review (2021)
Author(s)

Joseph B. Bak-Coleman (University of Washington)

Mark Alfano (Australian Catholic University, TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Wolfram Barfuss (Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen)

Carl T. Bergstrom (University of Washington)

Miguel A. Centeno (Princeton University)

Iain D. Couzin (Universität Konstanz, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell am Bodensee)

Jonathan F. Donges (Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung, Stockholm University)

Mirta Galesic (Santa Fe Institute)

Andrew S. Gersick (Princeton University)

undefined More Authors (External organisation)

Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025764118 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Issue number
27
Volume number
118
Article number
e2025764118
Downloads counter
517
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Collective behavior provides a framework for understanding how the actions and properties of groups emerge from the way individuals generate and share information. In humans, information flows were initially shaped by natural selection yet are increasingly structured by emerging communication technologies. Our larger, more complex social networks now transfer high-fidelity information over vast distances at low cost. The digital age and the rise of social media have accelerated changes to our social systems, with poorly understood functional consequences. This gap in our knowledge represents a principal challenge to scientific progress, democracy, and actions to address global crises. We argue that the study of collective behavior must rise to a “crisis discipline” just as medicine, conservation, and climate science have, with a focus on providing actionable insight to policymakers and regulators for the stewardship of social systems.