On the Problem of Double-Filtering in PPP-RTK

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Amir Khodabandeh (University of Melbourne)

Peter Teunissen (Curtin University, University of Melbourne, TU Delft - Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning)

D. Psychas (European Space Agency (ESA))

Research Group
Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning
Copyright
© 2023 A. Khodabandeh, P.J.G. Teunissen, D. Psychas
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010229
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 A. Khodabandeh, P.J.G. Teunissen, D. Psychas
Research Group
Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning
Issue number
1
Volume number
23
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

To obtain single-receiver Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) parameter solutions, the PPP-RTK user-filter combines measurements with time-correlated corrections that are separately computed by the filter of an external provider. The consequence of exercising such double-filtering is that the Kalman filter’s standard assumption of having uncorrelated measurements in time becomes violated. This leads the user-filter to lose its ‘minimum variance’ property, thereby delivering imprecise parameter solutions. The solutions’ precision-loss becomes more pronounced when one experiences an increase in the correction latency, i.e., the delay in time after the corrections are estimated and the time they are applied to the user measurements. In this contribution, we propose a new multi-epoch formulation for the PPP-RTK user-filter upon which both the uncertainty and the temporal correlation of the corrections are incorporated. By a proper augmentation of the user-filter state-vector, the corrections are jointly measurement-updated with the user parameter solutions. Supported by numerical results, the proposed formulation is shown to outperform its commonly used counterpart in the minimum-variance sense.